Bỏ qua để đến Nội dung
Menu
Câu hỏi này đã bị gắn cờ
1 Trả lời
5087 Lượt xem

Instead of calling update_some_regular_fields() method at the end of overwritten create() and write() methods, why can't I just decorate update_some_regular_fields() method with @api.onchange() or @api.depends()? This would shorten the code considerably and make it readable, but the decorators seem to only react on changes from UI and ignore all other programmatic changes to DB records.

Also, with self being a virtual record in the onchange method, changes to records other than self are obviously ignored.

Maybe it's more of a feature request?

Ảnh đại diện
Huỷ bỏ
Câu trả lời hay nhất

Hy,


For the onchange, it's legitim to consider that only one 1 record must be concerned because it's about client behaviour.

For the depends, I think it shoudl be compute one by one but could be done on multiple records. (eg via mass editing)

regards

Ảnh đại diện
Huỷ bỏ
Bài viết liên quan Trả lời Lượt xem Hoạt động
2
thg 4 25
3027
3
thg 11 24
18191
1
thg 11 22
3246
2
thg 12 19
8262
1
thg 3 19
3640