تخطي للذهاب إلى المحتوى
القائمة
لقد تم الإبلاغ عن هذا السؤال
1 الرد
5053 أدوات العرض

Instead of calling update_some_regular_fields() method at the end of overwritten create() and write() methods, why can't I just decorate update_some_regular_fields() method with @api.onchange() or @api.depends()? This would shorten the code considerably and make it readable, but the decorators seem to only react on changes from UI and ignore all other programmatic changes to DB records.

Also, with self being a virtual record in the onchange method, changes to records other than self are obviously ignored.

Maybe it's more of a feature request?

الصورة الرمزية
إهمال
أفضل إجابة

Hy,


For the onchange, it's legitim to consider that only one 1 record must be concerned because it's about client behaviour.

For the depends, I think it shoudl be compute one by one but could be done on multiple records. (eg via mass editing)

regards

الصورة الرمزية
إهمال
المنشورات ذات الصلة الردود أدوات العرض النشاط
2
أبريل 25
3003
3
نوفمبر 24
18083
1
نوفمبر 22
3229
2
ديسمبر 19
8239
1
مارس 19
3619