Skip to Content
Menu
Musisz się zarejestrować, aby móc wchodzić w interakcje z tą społecznością.
To pytanie dostało ostrzeżenie
1 Odpowiedz
4947 Widoki

Instead of calling update_some_regular_fields() method at the end of overwritten create() and write() methods, why can't I just decorate update_some_regular_fields() method with @api.onchange() or @api.depends()? This would shorten the code considerably and make it readable, but the decorators seem to only react on changes from UI and ignore all other programmatic changes to DB records.

Also, with self being a virtual record in the onchange method, changes to records other than self are obviously ignored.

Maybe it's more of a feature request?

Awatar
Odrzuć
Najlepsza odpowiedź

Hy,


For the onchange, it's legitim to consider that only one 1 record must be concerned because it's about client behaviour.

For the depends, I think it shoudl be compute one by one but could be done on multiple records. (eg via mass editing)

regards

Awatar
Odrzuć
Powiązane posty Odpowiedzi Widoki Czynność
2
kwi 25
2887
3
lis 24
17751
1
lis 22
3108
2
gru 19
8144
1
mar 19
3581