Skip to Content
Menu
Musisz się zarejestrować, aby móc wchodzić w interakcje z tą społecznością.
To pytanie dostało ostrzeżenie
1 Odpowiedz
5632 Widoki

Instead of calling update_some_regular_fields() method at the end of overwritten create() and write() methods, why can't I just decorate update_some_regular_fields() method with @api.onchange() or @api.depends()? This would shorten the code considerably and make it readable, but the decorators seem to only react on changes from UI and ignore all other programmatic changes to DB records.

Also, with self being a virtual record in the onchange method, changes to records other than self are obviously ignored.

Maybe it's more of a feature request?

Awatar
Odrzuć
Najlepsza odpowiedź

Hy,


For the onchange, it's legitim to consider that only one 1 record must be concerned because it's about client behaviour.

For the depends, I think it shoudl be compute one by one but could be done on multiple records. (eg via mass editing)

regards

Awatar
Odrzuć
Powiązane posty Odpowiedzi Widoki Czynność
1
paź 25
359
2
kwi 25
3488
3
lis 24
19105
1
lis 22
3682
2
gru 19
8630