Passa al contenuto
Menu
È necessario essere registrati per interagire con la community.
La domanda è stata contrassegnata
1 Rispondi
5100 Visualizzazioni

Instead of calling update_some_regular_fields() method at the end of overwritten create() and write() methods, why can't I just decorate update_some_regular_fields() method with @api.onchange() or @api.depends()? This would shorten the code considerably and make it readable, but the decorators seem to only react on changes from UI and ignore all other programmatic changes to DB records.

Also, with self being a virtual record in the onchange method, changes to records other than self are obviously ignored.

Maybe it's more of a feature request?

Avatar
Abbandona
Risposta migliore

Hy,


For the onchange, it's legitim to consider that only one 1 record must be concerned because it's about client behaviour.

For the depends, I think it shoudl be compute one by one but could be done on multiple records. (eg via mass editing)

regards

Avatar
Abbandona
Post correlati Risposte Visualizzazioni Attività
2
apr 25
3031
3
nov 24
18207
1
nov 22
3248
2
dic 19
8266
1
mar 19
3645