Přejít na obsah
Menu
You need to be registered to interact with the community.
This question has been flagged
1 Odpovědět
5004 Zobrazení

Instead of calling update_some_regular_fields() method at the end of overwritten create() and write() methods, why can't I just decorate update_some_regular_fields() method with @api.onchange() or @api.depends()? This would shorten the code considerably and make it readable, but the decorators seem to only react on changes from UI and ignore all other programmatic changes to DB records.

Also, with self being a virtual record in the onchange method, changes to records other than self are obviously ignored.

Maybe it's more of a feature request?

Avatar
Zrušit
Nejlepší odpověď

Hy,


For the onchange, it's legitim to consider that only one 1 record must be concerned because it's about client behaviour.

For the depends, I think it shoudl be compute one by one but could be done on multiple records. (eg via mass editing)

regards

Avatar
Zrušit
Related Posts Odpovědi Zobrazení Aktivita
2
dub 25
2942
3
lis 24
17850
1
lis 22
3129
2
pro 19
8178
1
bře 19
3597