Advanced Search shows all the fields, I want to remove some fields
give me your suggestions or procedures
Odoo is the world's easiest all-in-one management software.
It includes hundreds of business apps:
Advanced Search shows all the fields, I want to remove some fields
give me your suggestions or procedures
I implemented this for one of my customers who wanted to show fields in the advanced search of products according to the product category defined in context.
The advanced search widget doesn't show fields with the option selectable = False, as you can see here. Unfortunately I didn't find a way that worked to set that option for the field, and I needed it to be a dynamic option (according to some value in context in my case) anyway, so I did it by inheriting fields_get of the model, call the super method which will return a dict of fields with their options, and then add the option selectable=False to the fields I wanted to hide. For example:
def fields_get(self, cr, uid, fields=None, context=None): fields_to_hide = ['description_sale', 'reference'] # you can set this dynamically res = super(product_product, self).fields_get(cr, uid, fields, context) for field in fields_to_hide: res[field]['selectable'] = False return res
I hope it's clear.
NOTE:
This code works only if your OpenERP/Odoo branch revision is later than this revision
- server: xal@openerp.com-20131218111214-543cjhkp6k0steyi
- web: xal@openerp.com-20131218113547-myl7eihvw5vbzkaa
Suggestion from Leonardo Donelli works well for me in v11 (self, context=None) and res = super(class_name, self).fields_get(self, context)
. Thank you!
But, solution:
Set field groups to hide it.
fields.Char(groups="base.group_system")
Create an account today to enjoy exclusive features and engage with our awesome community!
Sign upRelated Posts | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
0
Jan 23
|
1219 | ||
|
0
May 22
|
2099 | ||
|
1
Dec 15
|
5185 | ||
|
3
May 25
|
639 | ||
|
1
Apr 25
|
463 |
@Rajkumar, Is there any progress with this question? I am facing a similar problem too. If yes, please update your solution