Zum Inhalt springen
Menü
Sie müssen registriert sein, um mit der Community zu interagieren.
Diese Frage wurde gekennzeichnet
1 Antworten
6009 Ansichten

Such as employee A belong the department A, employee B belong the department B.
The employee A can not see any information of B, such as "Time Off", "Employee", "Calendar",because of different department.

Avatar
Verwerfen
Beste Antwort

You should be able to use Record Rules.  

If you look in the demo database you should see one example with this domain:

['|',
'|', ('employee_id.user_id', '=', user.id), ('employee_id.parent_id.user_id', '=', user.id),
'|', '|', ('department_id', '=', False), ('department_id.member_ids.user_id', 'in', [user.id]), ('department_id.manager_id.user_id', '=', user.id)]


There's another example in this question.

Avatar
Verwerfen
Autor

Try to add one customize rules in 'Settings-Technical-Record Rules',but the user(not administrator) still can see all the employee in 'Employee' App

Name:Customize

Object:Basic Employee

Active:yes

Rule Definition (Domain Filter):

['|',

'|', ('employee_id.user_id', '=', user.id), ('employee_id.parent_id.user_id', '=', user.id),

'|', '|', ('department_id', '=', False), ('department_id.member_ids.user_id', 'in', [user.id]), ('department_id.manager_id.user_id', '=', user.id)]

Access Rights:read

Group:global

Sorry, I'm not an expert on the database structure for the Employee app, I was just offering some advice about Record Rules.

Autor

Thank you all the same

Verknüpfte Beiträge Antworten Ansichten Aktivität
1
Aug. 25
3662
1
Okt. 24
3350
2
Juli 24
2216
0
Mai 23
2431
9
Dez. 23
33482