Skip ke Konten
Menu
Pertanyaan ini telah diberikan tanda
2 Replies
6097 Tampilan

EDIT: Simple mistake, I inherited "mrp.view_mrp_production_workcenter_form_view_filter", when I should have inherited "mrp_operations.view_mrp_production_workcenter_form_view_filter".

 

I am trying to add a "group by..." for customer to Work Orders and am having some trouble. Currently I have a customer field defined on each product (many2one) that then gets translated via fields.related to the Manufacturing Order and Work Order views. This is working without issue. I am trying to sort my Work Orders by customer now using "Group By...", but for some reason my code isn't working. If someone could check it out for me I'd really appreciate it.

   

My  current code:

 

    <record id="view_workcenter_customer_domain_search" model="ir.ui.view">

        <field name="name">workcenter.customer.domain.search</field>

        <field name="model">mrp.production.workcenter.line</field>

        <field name="inherit_id" ref="mrp.view_mrp_production_workcenter_form_view_filter"/>

        <field name="arch" type="xml">

            <xpath expr="//group/filter[@string='Date']" position="after">

                    <filter string="Customer" icon="terp-go-home" domain="[]" context="{'group_by':'customer_name'}"/>

            </xpath>

        </field>

    </record>

Avatar
Buang

Define 'isn't working' - an error, the wrong result, no result ?

Penulis

No errors, but no result at all.

Jawaban Terbai

(FROM ALEX) Simple mistake, I inherited "mrp.view_mrp_production_workcenter_form_view_filter", when I should have inherited "mrp_operations.view_mrp_production_workcenter_form_view_filter".

Avatar
Buang
Jawaban Terbai

I don't know which version you're using, but I don't find 'Date' in the filter (v6.1). Maybe 'Late':

<xpath expr="//group/filter[@string='Late']" position="after">

...

Avatar
Buang
Penulis

I am trying to edit the "Group By..." section, not the normal filter section. I am not familiar with V6, so I don't know if that feature exists. It should work similarly though.