Skip to Content
Menu
This question has been flagged
2 Replies
6228 Rodiniai

EDIT: Simple mistake, I inherited "mrp.view_mrp_production_workcenter_form_view_filter", when I should have inherited "mrp_operations.view_mrp_production_workcenter_form_view_filter".

 

I am trying to add a "group by..." for customer to Work Orders and am having some trouble. Currently I have a customer field defined on each product (many2one) that then gets translated via fields.related to the Manufacturing Order and Work Order views. This is working without issue. I am trying to sort my Work Orders by customer now using "Group By...", but for some reason my code isn't working. If someone could check it out for me I'd really appreciate it.

   

My  current code:

 

    <record id="view_workcenter_customer_domain_search" model="ir.ui.view">

        <field name="name">workcenter.customer.domain.search</field>

        <field name="model">mrp.production.workcenter.line</field>

        <field name="inherit_id" ref="mrp.view_mrp_production_workcenter_form_view_filter"/>

        <field name="arch" type="xml">

            <xpath expr="//group/filter[@string='Date']" position="after">

                    <filter string="Customer" icon="terp-go-home" domain="[]" context="{'group_by':'customer_name'}"/>

            </xpath>

        </field>

    </record>

Portretas
Atmesti

Define 'isn't working' - an error, the wrong result, no result ?

Autorius

No errors, but no result at all.

Best Answer

(FROM ALEX) Simple mistake, I inherited "mrp.view_mrp_production_workcenter_form_view_filter", when I should have inherited "mrp_operations.view_mrp_production_workcenter_form_view_filter".

Portretas
Atmesti
Best Answer

I don't know which version you're using, but I don't find 'Date' in the filter (v6.1). Maybe 'Late':

<xpath expr="//group/filter[@string='Late']" position="after">

...

Portretas
Atmesti
Autorius

I am trying to edit the "Group By..." section, not the normal filter section. I am not familiar with V6, so I don't know if that feature exists. It should work similarly though.