콘텐츠로 건너뛰기
메뉴
커뮤니티에 참여하려면 회원 가입을 하시기 바랍니다.
신고된 질문입니다
1 회신
7023 화면

I've seen a model that has a status or state field which is done as fields.selection() and I've seen it done as a fields.many2one().  Both ways of doing it seem to work fine and do the job. 

I suppose many2one is best when you expect to have new values to add over time. 

I am wondering if there are any best practices as to which should be used under what cirmustances.  And what are the advantages and disavantages of each.  Or any notable experince in using one or the other.

 

아바타
취소

Hello Best practice according to me is to use : many2one : for relations with another object (wich can be edited... add choice, ...) Eg: Category, manager, ... Selection : A static list (not evolutive). Eg: Status (Open / WIP / Close) JKE

작성자

Thank you jke, that is simple and makes sense.

베스트 답변

I wouldn't say that this is best practices, but here are some "differences" that would be your consideration points when making the design decision:

  • selection is a fixed list once rendered (this also applies to many2one fields which is viewed with widget="selection"), you cannot apply domain to it
  • selection will be pulled altogether at once when HTML is rendered (this also applies to many2one fields which is viewed with widget="selection").  Not a good choice if you have hundreds or thousands selection.
  • selection fields (this does NOT apply to many2one fields viewed with widget="selection") is not stored as a Foreign Key.  So you can remove an entry from the selection and no integrity problem will ensue.

As for the states, you can still make it a selection field whilst making it dynamic by supplying the entries from a table.  Selection field can accept a function as selection source.

아바타
취소
관련 게시물 답글 화면 활동
0
9월 19
3469
4
10월 21
37640
1
10월 20
12558
1
3월 15
5044
1
8월 25
3808