Pular para o conteúdo
Esta pergunta foi sinalizada
readonly
9 Respostas
64005 Visualizações
Avatar
dirtyHandsPHP

In Attendance section there is 'name' field used to display/edit date. I am having two user groups 'base.group_user' and 'base.group_hr_user'. I want to use inheritance and make this field readonly for 'base.group_user' group and other group 'base.group_hr_user' should work as it is.

Searched over this community and did some changes like that

<record id="odoo_hr_attendance_view_form" model="ir.ui.view">
            <field name="name">hr.attendance.form.inherit</field>
            <field name="model">hr.attendance</field>
            <field name="inherit_id" ref="hr_attendance.view_attendance_form" />
            <field name="groups_id" eval="[(6,0, [ref('base.group_user')])]" />
            <field name="arch" type="xml">                
                <field name="name" position="attributes">
                   <attribute name="attrs">{'readonly':1}</attribute>                   
                </field>                
            </field>
</record>   

But now it's showing readonly for both the groups.

Can anyone please guide me how to achieve my results?

Avatar
Cancelar
Avatar
Mariusz Mizgier
Melhor resposta

It is because user, which is in base.group_hr_user is also in base.group_user - you should consider adding another attribute, that readonly is 0 when user belongs to base.group_hr_user.

Avatar
Cancelar
dirtyHandsPHP
Autor

@Mariusz Thanks for your answer. Tried following code as well but still not working : hr.attendance.form.inherithr.attendance{'readonly':1}hr.attendance.form.inherithr.attendance{'readonly':0}

dirtyHandsPHP
Autor

Tried as per your suggestion by adding one more code block with group base.group_hr_user and readonly 1 but not working :(

dirtyHandsPHP
Autor

Sorry readonly 0

Avatar
dirtyHandsPHP
Autor Melhor resposta

Thanks @Mariusz. I was able to fix the issue as  per your suggestion with following code:

<record id="oodo_hr_attendance_view_form" model="ir.ui.view">
            <field name="name">hr.attendance.form.inherit</field>
            <field name="model">hr.attendance</field>
            <field name="inherit_id" ref="hr_attendance.view_attendance_form" />
            <field name="groups_id" eval="[(6, 0, [ref('base.group_hr_manager') ])]" />                
            <field name="arch" type="xml">                                   
                <field name="name" position="attributes">
                   <attribute name="readonly">0</attribute>                   
                </field>                             
            </field>
</record>
<record id="ids_hr_attendance_view_form_mgr" model="ir.ui.view">
            <field name="name">hr.attendance.form.inheritmgr</field>

            <field name="model">hr.attendance</field>
            <field name="inherit_id" ref="hr_attendance.view_attendance_form" />
            <field name="groups_id" eval="[(6, 0, [ref('base.group_user') ])]" />                
            <field name="arch" type="xml">                                   
                <field name="name" position="attributes">
                   <attribute name="readonly">1</attribute>                   
                </field>                              
            </field>
</record>    

Avatar
Cancelar
Andreas Jonderko

Alternatively it is possible to use the @api.constraints definition, to handle the "access logic" by the server. This is my preferred way, as we use also the XML RPC Api, where this logic have to be covered:

@api.constrains("stage_id")
def check_stage_id_permission(self):
# for the default value on create
if self.env.context.get("disable_stage_check", False):
return True

if (
self.env.ref("my_extension.my_access_group_id").id
not in self.env.user.groups_id.ids
):
raise UserWarning(
_(
"You are not authorized to change stage"
)
)

# on create just call the super with the context to disable the stage change, to allow it as "default" value

@api.model
def create(self, values):
return super(
myMODEL, self.with_context(disable_stage_check=True)
).create(values)

Răzvan Anastasescu

@Andreas - nice solution but having that context to override might be a security issue, if somebody knows the context key can bypass it from any RPC call (browser or API), maybe use sudo() or some other way

Avatar
nagarjuna
Melhor resposta

Hi Shiv modi,

i have a view as like below, but the field is still readable. can you please help me on this.

<record id="view_staff_reservation_form" model="ir.ui.view">

<field name="name">reservation.form.view</field>

<field name="model">reservations.reservation</field>

<field name="groups_id" eval="[(6,0, [ref('base.group_library_user')])]" />

<field name="arch" type="xml">

<tree string="Reservation">

<field name="id"></field>

<field name="reserve_item_id"></field>

<field name="from_date"></field>

<field name="to_date"></field>

<field name="is_reserve"></field>

<field name="is_reserve_accepted" position="attributes">

<attribute name="attrs">{'readonly':1}</attribute>

</field>

</tree>

</field>

</record>

Avatar
Cancelar
Avatar
Mayank Gosai
Melhor resposta

Hello Nagarjuna,

Your code is :

<field name="is_reserve_accepted" position="attributes">

<attribute name="attrs">{'readonly':1}</attribute>

</field>

Replace it with:

<field name="is_reserve_accepted" position="attributes">

<attribute name="readonly">1</attribute>

</field>

Hope, it helps you.

Avatar
Cancelar
Publicações relacionadas Respostas Visualizações Atividade
Odoo Sales
readonly
Avatar
Avatar
1
out. 24
7832
How to set field readonly for user
readonly
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
8
nov. 19
8476
How to make specific field read-only after saving the record Resolvido
xml readonly
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
3
ago. 24
16801
Form view is visible but its data cannot modified
readonly lead
Avatar
0
mai. 23
2283
How can we make field read only based on group and status?
readonly group
Avatar
Avatar
1
mar. 23
2957