Hello,
I have started maintaining an installation of Odoo 13 that seems to be missing the Archive/Unarchive Actions for records and I have been trying to add this functionality back without success so far.
I hope people here can help me!
Odoo is the world's easiest all-in-one management software.
It includes hundreds of business apps:
Hello,
I have started maintaining an installation of Odoo 13 that seems to be missing the Archive/Unarchive Actions for records and I have been trying to add this functionality back without success so far.
I hope people here can help me!
Hi,
If there is no active field in the model, just add a active field of type of type boolean in the model and then add the same field to the view and keep it as invisible. Now you will have archive/unarchive option in the action button.
For more, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNRONFlI3xo
Thanks
Hello Niyas,
I am commenting here since I cannot comment on your other comment: yes, i am logged in as admin and i rechecked the access rights.
Hi Friederike Thies,
Archive and Unarchive options are available on a record if the model has a Boolean field named active
Follow these steps to add the active field,
In Py
active = fields.Boolean(default=True)
In XML,
Hope it helps,
Kiran K
In XML,
<field name="active" invisible="1"/>
Hello Kiran,
I tried that option on the Res.Users model but sadly it did not affect anything, the archive option is still missing.
Cree una cuenta para poder utilizar funciones exclusivas e interactuar con la comunidad.
RegistrarsePublicaciones relacionadas | Respuestas | Vistas | Actividad | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
abr 25
|
1112 | ||
Odoo Server Error
Resuelto
|
|
1
abr 25
|
1231 | |
|
1
nov 24
|
1369 | ||
|
0
nov 24
|
1486 | ||
|
0
oct 24
|
1510 |
Hello Niyas,
thank you for your reply, the forum does not yet allow me to answer you directly so I hope you see this:
I tried that approach. The option is missing for all models including res.users which is currently the most pressing for me, so I tried adding a new one and adding it to the form view, but sadly that did not fix the issue.