Hi all, i creating a salary slip for a every employee that will check the leave history, how many days leaves taken by the employee, i put Unpaid Rule "result=-(contract.wage/31)*worked_days.Unpaid.number_of_days", it defined for every employee, but employee didn't take leave means "Error! Wrong python condition defined for salary rule LOP (LOP)." i need a proper solution for this code. help me.
Dette spørgsmål er blevet anmeldt
3
Besvarelser
14802
Visninger
Hi Mr.Sridhar
"result=-(contract.wage/31)*worked_days.Unpaid.number_of_days"
wrong python code means you added "Unpaid" there in rule
just add result=-(contract.wage/31)*worked_days.number_of_days
Unpaid is not a field of worked_days (object)
i understand but Unpaid amount didn't calculate it has problem.
How can we deduct unpaid leave amount from the basic salary of Employee?
Plz tell me the python code for that.
I think the above mention code is for calculating the Salary on the basis of number of days worked by employee.
No... see salary Computation, that amount is deduct there.
got it.. thanks.. we have to change the sequence number for that.
Thanks
I have added the solution for this question and the problem solved
Hi @Sandeep , in development , how can I put new type of hourly leave and take the total hours and use it in payslip ?
Hi Sandeep,Can you please tell me how to configure the unpaid leaes in hre module on openerp7 .i have made the salary rule as of the explanation "result=-(contract.wage/31)*worked_days.number_of_days"
but its not showing up in the payslip when i clicks on computation
button
help me on this aspect through
Email :seeramt@sify.com orelse
skype : seeramt1
Kan du lide at diskutere? Læs ikke bare med, deltag aktivt i debatten!
Opret en konto i dag for at få glæde af eksklusive funktioner, og bliv en del af vores skønne fællesskab!
Tilmeld dig| Relaterede indlæg | Besvarelser | Visninger | Aktivitet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
7
jan. 26
|
23796 | ||
|
0
maj 22
|
4527 | ||
|
1
maj 22
|
3395 | ||
|
1
jan. 22
|
3134 | ||
|
1
okt. 21
|
16330 |
the bellow answer will solve your problem .. you just need a condition for the rule