Technical mailing list archives
Re: PyPy (it work's !)by
I'm still very much interested in Pypy + Odoo so it would be great if you have time to look into lxml cffi !
BTW, you asked about memory usage of Odoo + Pypy. Well, I have bad news for this one: Pypy uses much more memory than cpython (2-5 times...).
I don't have any idea why it is like this, and to investigate we need jit aware profiling so we need Odoo + Pypy 2.6, so we need lxml cffi...
On 09-06-15 19:29, Nicolas PIGANEAU wrote: > Yes, I guess you are right, it seems that CPython is best on database stuff and PyPy on Python. > Here are my latest findings: > - First of all, amauryfa's cffi version of lxml does not compile on PyPy 2.6 with cffi 1.1 > (https://github.com/amauryfa/lxml/issues/9). It's a pity because it seems that this project > is not very active recently. Hi Nicolas, I'm terribly sorry for the late reply. I only noticed your e-mail today (it disappeared in a long bunch of other Odoo mails). It's pretty coincidental, but I'm getting into CFFI next week, because I'm rewriting a Python script as a C++ module. If people are still interested in PyPy + Odoo, I could have a look into the lxml cffi versions after I rewrote npTDMS in C++. Ruben
Post to: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org