Community mailing list archives
community@mail.odoo.com
Browse archives
Re: New OCA repository to suggest
by
Daniel Reis
A couple of comments:
<blockquote cite="mid:CADMExDHC2pyBs+gX5cYiOycWsQsoLBaop90cHDJzNaS9tKL8TA@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
This means than OCA repos would need a OCB-like sync script with upstream changes.
<blockquote cite="mid:CADMExDHC2pyBs+gX5cYiOycWsQsoLBaop90cHDJzNaS9tKL8TA@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
OCA repositories are trustable because they are "guarded" by
maintainers: no changes are made without a review process.
Having a repo on the author's repository defeats these benefits.
Regards
Daniel
<blockquote cite="mid:CADMExDHC2pyBs+gX5cYiOycWsQsoLBaop90cHDJzNaS9tKL8TA@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
- Modules are collected in the "scope" OCA
repositories as submodules.
"the submodule support just stores the submodule repository location
and commit ID".This means than OCA repos would need a OCB-like sync script with upstream changes.
<blockquote cite="mid:CADMExDHC2pyBs+gX5cYiOycWsQsoLBaop90cHDJzNaS9tKL8TA@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
Basically
the OCA repositories act only as a "collection" of modules
(and stable commits) but all the development happens on the
author repositories, which should be cleaner (in addition to
all the points highlighted by Leonardo Pistone I would add: no
mixed issues and pull requests!)
Having a repo on the author's repository defeats these benefits.
Regards
Daniel
