The company for more than 1 year may be dismissed. Personnel who still wanted to continue working can be transferred to the nearest branch. They took all the contact details of the employees and said that if there is a place in another store, they will contact them (this means that they will have the first preference) And they send letters to each of the employees and tell them what will happen to them. Thus, from above, we can say that thanks to good and solvable internal communication between staff and management, they solve the problem of closing the store.

A coordinated review team can effectively participate in many parts of the oversight control. Their experience with the substance can help them recognise signs of fraud. The Institute of Internal Auditors' Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (IIA Standards) state: The internal examiner must have adequate information to recognise the signs of fraud, but does not rely on the ability of the person whose primary responsibility is to detect and investigate fraud. Internal inspectors can assess and control fraud risks and recommend actions to minimise risks and improve control. Some principles, such as IIA standards, are even required of internal inspectors to assess the potential risk of an organisation. These hazard assessments are at this stage the starting point for audit plans and internal control tests must also be submitted and approved by the audit firm. Very standard inquiries for all audit plans if an advisory group does not exist, it should be directed to the governing body. Moreover, the audit plans confirm that the board office has confirmed control.

Internal verification can play two parts: detection and prevention. Internal inspectors are remembered for preventing fraud by examining and evaluating the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control systems, but many people state that this is the responsibility of the board of directors. In fulfilling this commitment, salon appraisers should: assess the control climate, identify governance gaps, and have reliable correspondence with the board of directors.

People argue that internal inspectors should focus on cash exchanges as well as other non monetary reporting resources. Concomitant advances should be made: more use of logical research (since studying proportions and studying patterns can sometimes show us strange relationships with different records, especially when we have rather voluminous information that needs to be broken down and pondered), this dependence on the internal number of evaluators increased after SOX implementations, mainly through the 404 domain. Internal inspectors can use a variety of analytical or other methodologies to prevent and detect collaborative fraud, they may look for certain types of fraud, or they may actually see how high the risk is. Any doubts about fraud or board involvement should be resolved directly by the Review Advisory Group.